wcunning 62 days ago [-]
I've noticed, recently, that literally every major chain store I go into blocks my cell signal. I get full bars outside, perfect LTE, and about 5 ft past the glass doors, I'm suddenly cut off. Specifically, Meijer grocery stores and Home Depot are the worst offenders. Coincidentally they offer free in store WiFi to track me with, so I turn off my wifi radio on both smartphone and smartwatch before walking in the door... Note, this was not the case in the exact same physical stores a couple years ago, and they weren't closed for remodeling in the interim.

Does anyone know if this sort of Faraday cage technology for large buildings is easily available for me to install in my own home? If so, what's it called, what does it cost and where do I get it?

chipperyman573 62 days ago [-]
FWIW, if they are intentionally (or unintentionally) blocking your cell signal with an electronic signal (And since you mentioned that they didn't remodel, this is the only way they could feasibly do it), they're breaking a very serious FCC law - https://www.fcc.gov/general/jammer-enforcement.

I know that the FCC is kind of regarded as a joke lately, but this is a law they take pretty seriously as jammers can interfere with E911 calls. It would just take one emergency that 911 couldn't respond to for the FCC to realize what was going on, and no large store is going to take those odds. It's likely something else.

That said, if you really believe that they are blocking cell signals, you should probably file a tipoff, as they could honestly be putting lives at risk (go to https://consumercomplaints.fcc.gov/hc/en-us and click "phone"). As far as I know there's no penalty if you are wrong (as long as you honestly believe there might be an active jammer in the area and you aren't abusing their system somehow), worst case you'll get a call confirming they don't use one.

wcunning 62 days ago [-]
Yeah, I think it's more what lgats suggested, and simply that they have a naturally impermeable building in the middle. Not even the cabinets, more the metal shelving up to the ceiling and such. I also notice that my current phone does a terrible job of falling back on the much more long distance 3G, so maybe that's part of it.
mygo 62 days ago [-]
> Yeah, I think it's more what lgats suggested, and simply that they have a naturally impermeable building in the middle.

That kind of contradicts the OP... since they said that it was only recently that the signal stopped working, and that the building was not being remodeled during that time. So if the building is now impenetrable then something changed. Maybe modern phones just have a horrible time falling back from LTE to 4G/3G.. But if that’s the case then I feel like the OP would have checked for that since he seems to have already been tracking his connection strength over different locations and over time.

wcunning 61 days ago [-]
I was the OP...

I noticed this recently, but cell towers get upgraded/replaced at intervals unrelated to "nationwide rollout of LTE!" from carriers.

mygo 61 days ago [-]
Why you contradict yo self...
dundercoder 61 days ago [-]
A spectrum analyzer or SDR dongle would tip you off really quickly if there’s active jamming, and the FCC doesn’t play games with those types of violations.
lgats 62 days ago [-]
I believe you can achieve the same result in your home by adding a sheet metal roof, metal cabinets, and refrigerators along every wall.
cabaalis 62 days ago [-]
It's a rather unfortunate coincidence, isn't it? Certainly it's not their fault that their buildings just happen to be constructed in such a way, and their products arranged such that it blocks signal causing customers to not be able to compare prices and have to use their approved internet connection. /s

I see this in the Targets in my town. I just expect signal to drop to zero.

GhostVII 62 days ago [-]
I would be very surprised if the benefits from blocking signal outweighs the cost of constructing the building to intentionally block signal, and the risk of being sued for it. It's probably just something that happens naturally with those types of buildings.
King-Aaron 61 days ago [-]
I have a tin roof, metal front porch and a large metal rear-facing verandah at my house.. This effectively becomes a massive faraday cage as far as my phones concerned. The things that you wish you'd considered in hindsight when choosing construction materials.
davio 62 days ago [-]
My Lowe's and Home Depot both have free Wifi. I use it all the time to use their app or site to find the location of items in store (obv. can't talk to humans).
tjohns 62 days ago [-]
Target (specifically mentioned by the parent) in my town also offers free WiFi.
russh 62 days ago [-]
Good luck with that. I tried unsuccessfully, to buy an item at both Lowes and Home Depot but nobody was able to determine where in the store the item was even when I pulled the information up on my phone.
kbenson 62 days ago [-]
One of the Home Depot's in my area had broken Wifi for multiple months. You could connect, and go through the disclaimer, but nothing was reachable through it. Particularly annoying because the other store, which is about the same distance away, has working Wifi but horrible reception. Since I'm occasionally in each, I had to remember to forget the Home Depot Wifi and add it back in depending on when I wen tto different stores.
leesalminen 62 days ago [-]
Both the Lowe’s and Home Depot by me have the aisle/bay listed on their website. It’s usually super convenient, except for their numbering of end caps. That time it took a couple of tries until I found an employee who knew what was meant.
wcunning 62 days ago [-]
That's probably it. Perhaps I want some decorative brushed aluminum sheet metal instead of drywall...
ivanhoe 62 days ago [-]
Tin foil with a good earthing should do the trick.
binarymax 62 days ago [-]
Aluminum siding works pretty well!
jayd16 61 days ago [-]
Don't forget to stack large quantities of tin and aluminum cans about 8 feet high or so.
urda 62 days ago [-]
> and refrigerators along every wall.

Seems like a sound investment!

62 days ago [-]
randcraw 62 days ago [-]
In terms of passive signal blocking, I wonder if the chickenwire mesh that holds exterior stucco in place could serve as an effective Faraday cage? Or aluminum siding? I'm sure the metal roof and walls of a modular storage building would.

Most businesses use metal studs to support interior walls, though I doubt their ~2 foot spacing would block wifi or cellular RF.

In terms of active cellular jamming, that should be pretty easy to detect -- by standing in an outside doorway where you'd be exposed to inside AND outside signals, and then checking if your cellular bars fade out. That should indicate that you've been exposed to an internal jamming signal, since the external signal should still remain.

It's hard to imagine that the advantage to a corporation of isolating the customer's phone would be worth the risk of FCC prosecution.

King-Aaron 61 days ago [-]
> I wonder if the chickenwire mesh that holds exterior stucco in place could serve as an effective Faraday cage?

I can confirm that. I've had a shed in the past where I've used chicken wire to secure insulation and it seems to work well, albeit unintentionally at the time.

vertexFarm 61 days ago [-]
Your idea of mesh inside the stucco is way better than my idea of simply wrapping chicken wire all over the outside. Ha.

It should work, as long as it all has electrical continuity and is grounded. I think that's where a lot of normal mesh in stucco or plaster falls short; nobody is going to bother to connect it all up with copper strips or whatever if that's not their explicit goal.

Even if it's not, it should attenuate radio waves somewhat. Just not as a full-coverage Faraday cage.

chrsstrm 62 days ago [-]
Steel roof trusses, steel roof material, and racks and racks of steel shelving don't exactly make for an ideal radio signal environment. They aren't blocking signal, you are standing in an un-intentional Faraday cage. It likely has more to do with who your carrier is and what frequency your phone is connecting at. And FWIW, you don't have to be connected to a store's WiFi for them to track you - https://www.fastsensor.us/en/ is only just one of the many companies who don't require your cooperation to track you in-store.
riahi 62 days ago [-]
Could it be that they had repeater antennas before, but after the LTE upgrades, they either declined to renew the repeater leases in favor of wifi+tracking or perhaps the carriers didn't want to pay for hosting repeaters?
matt_the_bass 61 days ago [-]
Or a previously good cell radio nearby was moved, decommissioned, broke down, blocked by something else.
ChuckMcM 62 days ago [-]
A common cause for this is foil backed insulation. A number of companies install this in the ceiling spaces and outside walls to reduce the energy costs of keeping the store at a comfortable level.
jclardy 62 days ago [-]
I've noticed this, but my thought is that it is just the natural faraday cage created by having a cement building filled with metal shelves. Combine that with towers transitioning to use LTE over 3G and you get reduced coverage indoors in large buildings.
kalleboo 62 days ago [-]
Although where I live, the introduction of LTE on low bands reclaimed from analog TV has actually dramatically increased indoor coverage
kolpa 62 days ago [-]
If you could publish evidence of this phenomenon, the public would be very interested.
rootusrootus 62 days ago [-]
Anecdotally, I've had the same experience. Been going to Home Depot for a number of years, routinely using the app to locate the aisle I want in the store. Starting less than a year ago my signal becomes almost unusably weak as soon as I walk through the doors. No construction on the store, same store as has been there for a decade, but something changed. Might be a coincidence.
LgWoodenBadger 62 days ago [-]
It's somewhat similar, but AT&T (and Apple) have forced my iPhone to always join the "attwifi" public wireless networks (present in Home Depot, airports, etc.).

I can't make my iPhone NOT auto-join it, no matter how many steps, guides, hop-on-one-foot voodoo that I've tried.

The wireless network is terrible at everything except signal strength.

bobwaycott 62 days ago [-]
This isn’t something AT&T can force, afaik.

Two things:

1. Go to Settings > WiFi and turn Ask to Join Networks ON.

2. Any time you are auto-connected to a network and don’t want to do that again, go to Settings > WiFi, tap the blue info icon next to the currently active wifi network, and then tap Forget this Network when the details show up.

Ask to Join Networks is usually off by default. That means your phone will always attempt to join any public wifi without asking you first. Apple thinks this is friendlier for people. All known networks, once joined, will forever be auto rejoined in the future unless you turn Ask ON and forget each network you connect to (except those you trust and want to auto-join).

LgWoodenBadger 61 days ago [-]
Thank you (for those who don’t know) but I’ve already done that multiple times. I’ve reset network settings. I’ve done crazy voodoo with restarts, airplane mode, etc.

It’s possible that it’s been “fixed” in subsequent iOS updates. I haven’t tried recently.

saagarjha 61 days ago [-]
Do you have a Mac or iPad that it might be pulling the settings off of?
namibj 62 days ago [-]
Buy an iPhone, and get a seperate sim card for it. That way the phone is yours. And if you are careful, it shouldn't cost you more than a 1-digit sum, and even that would only be to cover postage when you hunt down a cheap offer.
wcunning 62 days ago [-]
Having discussed this with a couple of friends off of here, I should add some evidence of the tracking[0]. I agree with lgats sibling comment that this is likely just a function of the construction of the building and not outright illegal jamming.

[0] https://www.walkbase.com/blog/wi-fi-analytics-in-retail-stor...

woolvalley 62 days ago [-]
I haven't noticed it myself. Cell phone still works inside my local home depot.

Back in college the engineering building used metal plates as the outside facade, combined with concrete construction. It had a side effect of getting rid of any cell phone reception as a result, unless you were beside a window. The building was built before 2G cell phone service was a thing, so it wasn't an intentional thing.

62 days ago [-]
dejawu 60 days ago [-]
I always assumed stores were blocking cell signal (or certainly not doing anything to improve it, like installing LTE repeaters), to prevent you from going on Amazon and finding cheaper alternatives.
Nydhal 61 days ago [-]
"Available for me". Are you assuming we know who you are? What's available for you might be very out of reach to others. Farady cages are not some wallpaper you put on your house.
dboreham 62 days ago [-]
Go to hardware store (Home Depot would be ok but watch for poor cell reception). Buy 100 rolls of chicken wire and several gross of outdoor cable clips. Tack up all over outside surface of your house.
vertexFarm 61 days ago [-]
You could wrap your house in chicken wire and ground it. I think that's about as cheap and easy as it can get. Might make the HOA mad, though.
paulie_a 60 days ago [-]
That's why you avoid you should avoid living in an area with an HOA that's made up of bored retired middle managers.
gf263 62 days ago [-]
classic hackernews
RyanCavanaugh 62 days ago [-]
In a 5-4 decision in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyllo_v._United_States , the SCOTUS determined that police can't use thermal imaging on a house without a search warrant. I wonder what the vote would have been if the justices could have seen videos like this.
kolpa 62 days ago [-]
This seems nearly identical issue; why would you suspect the vote would differ?
JTbane 62 days ago [-]
Sometimes I wonder is this could be mitigated by literally covering your walls in aluminum foil. Maybe those "tinfoil hats" are on to something.
binarymax 62 days ago [-]
Just get aluminum siding, which was very popular before people switched to vinyl.
dsfyu404ed 61 days ago [-]
Having pulled some of it off to switch to vinyl I wish it was still readily available. It's orders of magnitude more durable than vinyl.
viggity 62 days ago [-]
FWIW, I don't think the cops were using thermal imaging to detect humans within a house - they were using it to detect abnormally high heat - from high temperature lamps used to grow pot. Originally they'd talk to the power company to see who is drawing irregularly high levels of power, but the growers started using diesel power generators to power their grow lights.
themodelplumber 62 days ago [-]
So this MIT method would be OK, since it's not thermal?
fermienrico 61 days ago [-]
It is still radiation of photons. Just different wavelengths (IR vs Radio).
visarga 62 days ago [-]
With this paper our last shreds of privacy are being taken away, but they presented the news with nice background music, so there's that.
Jach 62 days ago [-]
Guess you shouldn't read about what synthetic aperture radar systems have been able to do for decades... you can actually make a ghetto radar capable of capturing the data used for this demo with about $350 (in 2012) in materials. But don't worry too much. Their limitations section states that "the operating distance of a radio is dependent on its transmission power" so their system only works reliably up to 40 feet, which is true, but the dominating factor is simply distance, because any signal you get back will be attenuated proportional to 1/r^4. Pumping up the transmitted power to compensate takes a lot of energy that quickly gets you into needing operating licenses. Not to mention moving to using different frequencies that can give higher resolution of whatever you're imaging...
godelmachine 61 days ago [-]
It's because of the distance limitation that it will be used for medical purposes mostly, methinks.
bufbupa 62 days ago [-]
Meh, that seems a little sensationalist. Any significant metal would likely throw this in a loop. You could even buy paint with graphite in it to block weak RF signals outright. IIRC most military bases and data centers protect against this sort of leakage.
Sammi 62 days ago [-]
The potential for open/outdoor spaces is scary though. Radio "CCTVs" that see everyone over a large area.
kinsomo 62 days ago [-]
> Meh, that seems a little sensationalist. Any significant metal would likely throw this in a loop

Maybe even chicken wire in the walls.

vertexFarm 61 days ago [-]
They already have your up-to-the-second location and all your private data. All this adds is what pose you're currently making with your body.

Speaking of, I was halfway expecting to see a couple stick figures banging each other behind a wall somewhere in that video. I really think that would have been the frosting on top; they should consider this for the next video when it's time for another round of funding.

jwilk 62 days ago [-]
The skeletons appear to have very long legs, but no torsos.

I wonder if it was made intentionally that way to make them look less serious.

randcraw 62 days ago [-]
I also wonder how accurate their estimates are of arm and leg poses, much less their motions. I do believe they can detect the location of a torso. I don't believe they can do the same for forearms, hands, legs, or feet, or their precise motions.

I suspect the articulated pose and motion of their animated stick figures were extrapolated from progressions of articulations of limb poses that were learned from the light-based training videos, and then they were overlaid onto the wifi-based signal of only the moving trunk.

All that animation does look cool, though.

chaosmachine 62 days ago [-]
"Attacks only get better".
maxerickson 62 days ago [-]
No, this research documents information you are already leaking, it isn't taking anything away.
barbegal 62 days ago [-]
What this video (or even the paper) doesn't show is the large antenna arrays that are used to capture the heatmaps. A previous paper called "Capturing the human figure through a wall" [1] shows the type of antenna array used and in this paper they use two such antenna arrays to capture two planes to increase the accuracy.

[1] https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Capturing-the-human-fi...

sudhirj 62 days ago [-]
Love it. This is a game mechanic / movie superhero device that's been around a long time, just love the fact that this does it so simply and with so much promise. As sensitivity and the quality of the neural net increases, combined with AR, this is going to make super soldiers out of SWAT teams.
gknoy 62 days ago [-]
Maybe SWAT can use this to validate that it's actually the right house when serving a no-knock warrant. I'm cynical enough to feel like there's no way this is good for any of their targets, though.

Edit: Kolpa makes a really good point! This seems like a really good counter to SWATting, where the claim is that someone is holding hostages or something -- this could pretty effectively demonstrate that to be false if they see one person in an apartment sitting at a computer.

sudhirj 62 days ago [-]
No possible improvement to a SWAT team is ever good for a target. But I think this will prevent false positives a bit. Knowing the posture and stance of the people inside a room can help with where you aim as you go in.
noonespecial 62 days ago [-]
I'd be more afraid that they'd "fear for their lives" at every broomstick and fishing pole they saw through a wall and would start shooting before they even got to the door.
John_KZ 62 days ago [-]
This. It's quite possible that if it looks like you're holding something, they'll just shoot through the wall before even entering.
kinsomo 62 days ago [-]
> Maybe SWAT can use this to validate that it's actually the right house when serving a no-knock warrant.

How would a stick figure images help a SWAT team validate that they're at the right house?

This could only help them by giving them a clue about where to point their guns once they bust down the door.

kolpa 62 days ago [-]
For example, if they are expecting to find someone with several hostages, and they only find people lying in bed...
wcunning 62 days ago [-]
And this is why you build a shipping container house -- free Faraday cage, built right in. Not mention that it's not hard to convert shipping containers to meet California earthquake code, or so I've read.
beenBoutIT 62 days ago [-]
An earthquake could easily convert such a structure into a casket that 'respects your privacy' with no hope of dialing out for help.
dsfyu404ed 62 days ago [-]
> Not mention that it's not hard to convert shipping containers to meet California earthquake code, or so I've read.

Other than bolting crap down wouldn't that basically consist of making sure it won't tip over?

alexbeloi 62 days ago [-]
I hope you're not doing anything illegal, citizen.
warent 62 days ago [-]
Was just thinking that this reminds me of the alien weapon in Perfect Dark: https://youtu.be/8DlVQ6OjRcA?t=6s
mLuby 62 days ago [-]
Pretty common in games actually:

- Deus Ex: Human Revolution https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WoaLJ10ZB8

- GoldenEye: Rogue Agent https://youtu.be/EV8xxZec4j8?t=6m39s

62 days ago [-]
renborg 62 days ago [-]
but thermal imaging is already available without AI or WiFi..
namibj 62 days ago [-]
You might want to take a look at Big Clive's video about the radar motion detectors in Chinese E27 socket LED bulbs [0], which have become cheaper even back in mid-2016 than good old PIR motion detectors. The latter are basically a castrated Flir-style camera, the former closer to this.

[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FgdXRLjYkc4

sudhirj 62 days ago [-]
Not through walls. Radio penetrates a lot more than heat.
bufferoverflow 62 days ago [-]
Thermal doesn't work through/around walls.
musage 62 days ago [-]
Those who still have a few brain cells to rub together, think of Anne Frank.
aeleos 62 days ago [-]
It’s pretty amazing that they only trained it to create pose estimation from radio signals, and that its ability to see through walls is only a byproduct of them not blocking RF.

Given how much information is out there that we can’t sense I wonder if this area will be a main source of AI advancements. Another example of something like this is using videos of plants that vibrate slightly with sound waves to recreate the original sound.

jamesough 61 days ago [-]
Use ultra-wideband radio pulses, an array of a few thousand 3D printed UWB antennas and a phased-array scanning beam. You'll get a machine you could fit in the back of a truck that can scan a city block in real-time to mm precision. Sweet dreams, citizen.
femto 61 days ago [-]
Potentially not that simple, as there are fundamental limits on the information capacity of a MIMO system, based on the surface area of the volume occupied by the antenna array (in wavelengths squared). The capacity limits apply whether you use the array for communications or radar, as both are governed by Information Theory.

Not to say that it can't be done, but the maths exists to definitively prove whether it can be, so no need for speculation and tinfoil. My gut feeling is that you could scan a small volume from afar, but not a whole block. No, I haven't done the maths.

jamesough 61 days ago [-]
Yeah this is why you'd use UWB -- the capacity is insane. Also the raw information theory calculation makes sense only if you have zero prior information about the sample you're reconstructing. But 'people in buildings' is a pretty strong prior. And it's not like you have to do any extra work, just put a simulated raw signal through a neural net and regress to groundtruth data.

But let's do the math, I'm curious!

antisthenes 61 days ago [-]
So Dark Knight style imagery, all from 1 truck?

What's the range?

jamesough 61 days ago [-]
Depends on UWB bandwidth+power, how good your processing is + how many antennas you have... You could also get way better with a fleet of trucks spaced over a large area, or a city-sized swarm of drones, or satellites...
Animats 61 days ago [-]
The paper [1] doesn't show the antennas, but the text seems to indicate the antennas are quite large, as large as the area being observed. Plus, you have to have two perpendicular axes of antenna, so you have to be behind two walls, or one wall and a floor or ceiling. That's a big setup.

It might be useful if you wanted to count people in a crowd going in and out through a big opening, like a subway station or mall.

[1] http://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_cvpr_2018/papers/Zhao_T...

miguelrochefort 62 days ago [-]
I'll repeat it again.

- Machines that see through walls are coming

- Microscopic drones are coming

- Mind-reading machines are coming

- Private key cryptography will become obsolete

Fighting for privacy is backward. It's unsustainable. We must work toward a post-privacy world. The sooner we do it, the smoother the transition will be.

beenBoutIT 62 days ago [-]
Describing the exact same inevitable phenomena as "The Age of Transparency" is probably going to elicit a better response from most people. "Post Privacy" is negatively charged and makes it sound like more of a net loss as opposed to progress.
Sammi 61 days ago [-]
But they're the same thing. You can't get rid of the negative consequences just by using a different term.
musage 62 days ago [-]
That's because it is.
Sammi 62 days ago [-]
I'm scared. What is a post-privacy world?
miguelrochefort 62 days ago [-]
A world where you don't have to lie and keep secrets.

A world where people freely share knowledge and resources.

Sammi 62 days ago [-]
That sounds like a Mark Zuckerberg quote.
readams 62 days ago [-]
freedom is slavery

ignorance is strength

musage 62 days ago [-]
Smelly air is "coming", so prepare for it by eating lots of onions? Nah.

> I've heard quite a lot of people that talk about post-privacy, and they talk about it in terms of feeling like, you know, it's too late, we're done for, there's just no possibility for privacy left anymore and we just have to get used to it. And this is a pretty fascinating thing, because it seems to me that you never hear a feminist say that we're post-consent because there is rape. And why is that? The reason is that it's bullshit.

> We can't have a post-privacy world until we're post-privilege. So when we cave in our autonomy, then we can sort of say, "well, okay, we don't need privacy anymore, in fact we don't have privacy anymore, and I'm okay with that." Realistically though people are not comfortable with that. Because, if you only look at it from a position of privilege, like, say, white man on a stage, then yeah, maybe post-privacy works out okay for those people. But if you have ever not been, or if you are currently not, a white man with a passport from one of the five good nations in the world, it might not really work out well for you, and in fact it might be designed specifically such that it will continue to not work out well for you, because the structures themselves produce these inequalities.

> So when you hear someone talk about post-privacy, I think it's really important to engage them about their own privilege in the system and what it is they are actually arguing for.

-- Jacob Appelbaum

hammock 62 days ago [-]
Wi-fi has been researched for this capability since at least 2015: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGZzNZnYIHo
freyir 61 days ago [-]
It’s a new paper from the same group.

In 2015, the tracker person was just shown as an amorphous blob on the screen. In the recent paper, they display a stick figure modelling the movements of the person’s limbs.

thedirt0115 62 days ago [-]
Do the people that write these papers ever release their source code or trained model? I'm curious about both other researchers reproducing as well as being able to download something and play with it.
freyir 61 days ago [-]
They’re using custom hardware to make this work.

This isn’t always clear from the press release. For example, they mention that the technology works at “WiFi frequencies.” That’s true, but they’re sending a radar signal using two huge antennas, not a Wi-Fi router.

hathawsh 62 days ago [-]
Am I correct in assuming they are using a Walabot sensor as mentioned in footnote 2?


EDIT: I see from section 3 that they created their own FMCW antenna array that is somehow similar to a Walabot.

godelmachine 61 days ago [-]
May I ask what's FMCW? Of course I can straightaway google but I would like to hear an intuitive explaination.
hathawsh 60 days ago [-]
sebringj 62 days ago [-]
Through-Wall Human HeadShot Estimation Using Radio Signals...
concernedctzn 62 days ago [-]
I wonder how similar it is to the tech used in this paper on gesture recognition through walls: http://wisee.cs.washington.edu [2013]
barbegal 62 days ago [-]
They are quite different. Wisee uses a single reciever and uses doppler shift to identify the gestures whereas this "through wall" system uses an array of transmitters and receivers that identify reflections from a position in space.

In layman's terms this system is more like a conventional camera but working in the radio spectrum whereas Wisee is like a microphone that can pick up changes in frequencies around it.

bufbupa 62 days ago [-]
Finally, a legit purpose for my tinfoil hat!
amenod 62 days ago [-]
I know you're joking, but that's an interesting idea... I wonder how would the system "see" your head then? Unless it is trained on people wearing tinfoil hats (and aluminium suits) it might produce interesting results.
barbegal 62 days ago [-]
Adding a tinfoil hat would make you reflect more which the system would pick up even easier.
amenod 61 days ago [-]
Probably true - but it wasn't trained on such dataset, so I'm curious how robust it is.
DoreenMichele 62 days ago [-]

You clearly didn't read the manual.

zlynx 62 days ago [-]
Just like people running open WiFi access points getting upset about anyone reading their packets. They don't think about what they can't see.

A building that doesn't block radio and IR (and others) is essentially transparent. Putting an emitter like a WiFi point inside is like turning on a light.

What we need is more attention put to building better walls.

mt3ck 62 days ago [-]
maybe so... but only external walls right and even then dont you want wifi in the back yard?
mathnmusic 62 days ago [-]
Does it matter if our WiFi points are always on?
matte_black 62 days ago [-]
Presence detection can easily toggle WiFi on and off based on if people are present.
rl3 61 days ago [-]
The defense applications for this are tantalizing. However, given the staggering amount of room clearing that's been taking place in US military operations for the past 15 or so years, I'd be shocked if there wasn't already an existing capability to detect bad guys through walls in a CQB environment.
dsfyu404ed 61 days ago [-]
>I'd be shocked if there wasn't already an existing capability to detect bad guys through walls in a CQB environment.

Existing and exist in a state you can deploy are two totally different things that often happen many years apart. Usually something exists as an impractical wish list item for a long time before some other development pushes it into the realm of being practical to use.

rl3 61 days ago [-]
Yeah, it's just that western special operations kick in so many doors on a daily basis that one would think such tech would be fast-tracked.
godelmachine 61 days ago [-]
May I ask what's CQB?
rl3 61 days ago [-]
Close Quarters Battle
packeted 62 days ago [-]
Awesome. I was playing Batman Arkham City yesterday and this is "Detective Mode" in the real life!
TremendousJudge 62 days ago [-]
Yeah, I wonder what they are going to use this technology for. "Helping earthquake victims" probably
thirduncle 62 days ago [-]
aeleos 62 days ago [-]
I bet some RF absorbing material or something that reflects RF at weird angles would probably break it. Or an active RF transmitter.
John_KZ 62 days ago [-]
Build an electronic warfare device that makes it look like hundreds of people are inside, all pointing guns outwards.
sudhirj 62 days ago [-]
Make all walls a Faraday cage / concrete. If you can’t get cell or radio reception inside, you probably aren’t leaking anything either.
kawfey 62 days ago [-]
anything metal in the way. I'm sure the image would be a lot less clear if the wall had metal studs instead of wood.
femto 61 days ago [-]
Carry something metallic, so the neural network no longer classifies your reflection as human?
62 days ago [-]
enervate 62 days ago [-]
I guess now we know how that beginning scene in altered carbon could work
gaius 62 days ago [-]
There are no legitimate uses of this technique. It only applies if you lack the consent of the target. If have that, there are many easier and better ways to monitor them.
murdockq 62 days ago [-]
A personal home security system could make better use of this instead of motion sensors in each room.
grkvlt 60 days ago [-]
As mentioned elsewhere, detecting earthquake victims maybe, a terrorist or hostage situation where the targets definitely aren't giving consent, military situations and covert surveillance for law enforcement and counter espionage all spring to mind as legitimate and useful applications.
oh_sigh 62 days ago [-]
SWAT team dealing with a hostage situation in a closed room
godelmachine 61 days ago [-]
It can also be used to monitor a baby's respiration
bitL 62 days ago [-]
We need multiple home robots to fake our presence now!
ttul 62 days ago [-]
Amazing what a bit of military funding can achieve.
lolc 62 days ago [-]
Wow great work! I'm stunned. Not really by the pose-recognition, that's just a bonus.
gohwell 62 days ago [-]
Does it only detect moving bodies?
sudhirj 62 days ago [-]
Depends on the training data and the room config. The system sees a difference in an empty vs occupied room, movement doesn’t seem to be strictly necessary. The heat map video looks more like radio spectrum signatures, which might even be working on still frames - which would imply that movement isn’t necessary at all. It would help the AI, though. Easier to classify moving bodies, the speed and gait is a signal.
godelmachine 62 days ago [-]
I would like to get more research of this sort.

Would someone kindly point me towards it?


Jach 62 days ago [-]
I built and extended this for a college project years ago: https://ocw.mit.edu/resources/res-ll-003-build-a-small-radar...

It's not a bad place to start. And cheap if you want to build your own too (some third party even sells the "cantennas" so you don't have to fiddle with tuning that part (which is kind of infeasible without a network analyzer anyway)).

godelmachine 62 days ago [-]
Thanks Jach
adw 62 days ago [-]
A good place to start would be the paper's references.
godelmachine 62 days ago [-]
I went to the website and casually looked down. There was a "see also" section. Browsed through those and remembered Prof Dina Katabi demonstrating this concept before Prez Obama in the White House, few years ago.

Will go through references too :)

adw 62 days ago [-]
I come at this entirely from the ML side, not the hardware one, so that stuff is a mystery to me :-)
maxander 62 days ago [-]
We could be using this technology to see tumors and other pathologies through patients’ skin. Instead we’re using it to give soldiers and spies x-ray vision.
gus_massa 61 days ago [-]
No we can't use this radio signals to see tumors, because science is not magic and wishful thinking will not solve the technical problems. Let's try to name a few:

The radio signals are absorbed by wet salty meatbags, so you can find them using radio signals, but you can't see thru them. If you raise the power to compensate the absorption, you will cook the meatbags, like a microwave oven.

If you were lucky to get a signal at the other end, the radio signal can distinguish between meat-bone-air-water, but not between tissues like meat and tumors that have a somewhat similar composition. A tomography use contrast to try to distinguish them. A magnetic resonance is better, but it use a huge magnet (and in some cases it use contrast too).

And also, the radio frequency that they are using has a wavelength of an inch approximately. So roughly it can resolve things that are an inch long, so it must be a big tumor to be visible. Perhaps you can try with a higher frequency that has a smaller wavelength.

And if I understand correctly, this device needs a lot of calibration, so you need version of the part of the body without the tumor and a version with tumors of different sizes and positions to calibrate the device and then try to use it in the real subject.

mabbo 62 days ago [-]
Why can't it be both? Science and technology advance in often unexpected directions and for new purposes all the time. Satellites in orbit came from ICBM research, GPS from military location tracking, the tiny electronics in your phone are the grandchildren of at least one miniature spy device.
dznodes 62 days ago [-]
MIT's new anti-fapping radar!
himom 62 days ago [-]
Almost like The Eraser (1996), just add squad railgun rifles and X-ray-like targeting.
con22 62 days ago [-]
we have nothing to hide now!
ggg9990 62 days ago [-]
Look at the list of names on this paper. We better fix our immigration system for high skill individuals.
jjoonathan 62 days ago [-]
Devil's advocate: "let's fund PhDs with respectable salaries instead of green cards."
hello_1234 62 days ago [-]
We are talking about MIT. Their acceptance rate is around 6%. I am sure they get plenty of applications from the smartest American undergrads. Assuming that they choose the best and the brightest, it makes sense that they would have students from all over the world. Americans don't have a monopoly on intelligence.
throwawayjava 62 days ago [-]
You are both correct.

Many Americans choose not to go into academia (at every level) because the other options are much more lucrative. It is true that many of America's best minds do not pursue a PhD in large part because of the paltry stipend.

It is also absolutely true that the one top CS PhD program I know of does not compromise in admissions and does not suffer from a lack of highly qualified applicants.

> Americans don't have a monopoly on intelligence.

I think it's possible to agree with this point while still believing that American CS Ph.D. programs -- especially those outside the top N -- are not as attractive to domestic applicants as they probably should be.

RIMR 62 days ago [-]
>Americans don't have a monopoly on intelligence.

Sadly, we seem to be quite deficient in that department compared to other first world countries...

kolpa 62 days ago [-]
How does that solve the problem of attracting talent?
jjoonathan 62 days ago [-]
It solves the problem of attracting American talent, not talent in general.

Immigrants get "paid" more than citizens to do a PhD in the U.S. because there's a green card "stapled" to each degree, which is of no value to citizens but of significant value to immigrants.

I called the argument "Devil's Advocate" because it is more than a little thankless to complain about someone working hard to obtain a privilege you were born into. It still hurts to have your dream job undercut by someone else, though.

RIMR 62 days ago [-]
>It still hurts to have your dream job undercut by someone else, though.

What an absolutely atrocious way to think of your fellow man...

If someone else is getting the job you want instead of you, they worked harder for it than you did. If you want your dream job, you need to be prepared to compete for it, regardless of what color skin the competition happens to have.

jjoonathan 62 days ago [-]
I declare support for a cause dramatically against my own interest but mention that it "still hurts" to do so (on account, you know, of it being against my interest) and you call my feeling an atrocity? It's not enough to merely do the right thing, I must also revel in the pain it causes me?

That's sick, it's an atrocious way to think of your fellow man, and it's the very attitude that put Donald Trump in office.

> If you want your dream job, you need to be prepared to compete...

Your post history suggests you are an American. Unless you are an American PhD student, you are almost certainly benefiting immensely from much stronger protectionism at this very moment, so take your self-righteousness, and stuff it.

dragonwriter 62 days ago [-]
> If someone else is getting the job you want instead of you, they worked harder for it than you did.

No, that's not a valid generalization. They may have worked less hard and been more talented. They may have worked less hard, been less talented, but had the good fortune to have better social connections. They may have worked less hard, been less talented, but benefit from non-germane status-based discrimination. Or, well, lots of other possibilities.

hello_1234 61 days ago [-]
I see this sentiment quite often on hackernews. Despite having more than enough, we are just bitter than we don't have more and it's blinding us from enjoying what we have. Immigrants are just the scapegoats.
jjoonathan 61 days ago [-]
Could you point at the part where I blamed immigrants? I knew when I posted that the HN crowd would likely hallucinate that I had done so no matter what precautions I took, but I want you to poke at that hallucination and watch your hand go through it.

I want you to understand that your mind created this mirage in order to protect you from the cognitive dissonance of telling someone to enjoy ruin at the hands of competition while simultaneously enjoying stringent protections from the very same kind of competition.

patrickyeon 62 days ago [-]
Why do you believe any of those names are not American?
ggg9990 62 days ago [-]
They're all American in some measure as they are all living in the US at MIT. But they are clearly immigrants or the descendants of immigrants.
RIMR 62 days ago [-]
Look, I get the point you're trying to make, and I know you're not trying to be racist or xenophobic, but implying that having a foreign-sounding name make you less than entirely American is a really bad look.

Literally everyone credited in this paper could have been born and raised in the USA with birthright citizenship. I know that, realistically, that's not the case, but jumping to assumptions about individuals based on how ethnic their names sound is a form for casual racism that has absolutely no place in academia.

More importantly, if non-citizens are so much more likely to get admitted to MIT than citizens, it's not the immigration system we should be worried about. We should be worried about our education system that fails to produce highly-educated and motivated adults that qualify for admittance into MIT.

I also need to call you out for even bringing "descendants of immigrants" into this conversation. The children of immigrants have a name in this country: American citizens. We ought not judge people for the national origins of their parents, we should judge them for their academic and professional merits.

matt_the_bass 61 days ago [-]
Thank you for taking the time to write this.
patrickyeon 62 days ago [-]
I mean... in 2016 1.2% of Americans were "American Indian", so outside of that small group everyone is "clearly immigrants or the descendants of immigrants".

It's pretty bad form to look at names and assume that someone isn't an American.

poundtown 62 days ago [-]
huh huh huh he said smaller micro movements...
qwantus 62 days ago [-]
More suicides to come. Humans need to feel in control of their own lives.
workinthehead 61 days ago [-]
Great. More murder tech. There's always funding for murder tech.
allthenews 62 days ago [-]
Great, as if I weren't already self-conscious about having my roommates overhear me, now they'll be able watch me masturbate through the walls too.